<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Teeeeejirrrrr &#187; measurebators</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beanos.com/~tsoutij/wp/tag/measurebators/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beanos.com/~tsoutij/wp</link>
	<description>I like food. I like hammers. I like bunnies.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 02:05:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Pixel Peeping Absurdity &#8211; Brand vs. Brand Color Rendition</title>
		<link>http://www.beanos.com/~tsoutij/wp/2008/11/pixel-peeping-absurdity-brand-vs-brand-color-rendition</link>
		<comments>http://www.beanos.com/~tsoutij/wp/2008/11/pixel-peeping-absurdity-brand-vs-brand-color-rendition#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tijger Tsou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Camera Gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nerding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[measurebators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography gone wrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pixel Peeping]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beanos.com/~tsoutij/wp/?p=182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I&#8217;m generally for the practice of pixel peeping, as long as it is done in moderation. In case you don&#8217;t know what pixel peeping entails, it&#8217;s real simple and roughly goes along these steps:

Get two or more cameras that you want to compare. Let&#8217;s use one that you love, and one that you hate.
Pick a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wpg2tag-image"><a href="http://www.beanos.com/gallery/v/tsoutij/stuff/mona_lisa.JPG.html" title="The Mona Lisa"><img src="http://www.beanos.com/gallery/d/32050-7/mona_lisa.JPG" width="400" height="400" id="IFid2" class="ImageFrame_none" alt="The Mona Lisa"/></a></div>
<p><!-- patch in wpg2embed.inc to make this work. --></p>
<p>I&#8217;m generally for the practice of pixel peeping, as long as it is done in moderation. In case you don&#8217;t know what pixel peeping entails, it&#8217;s real simple and roughly goes along these steps:</p>
<ol>
<li>Get two or more cameras that you want to compare. Let&#8217;s use one that you love, and one that you hate.</li>
<li>Pick a subject to photograph, preferably a still life or something that won&#8217;t move much or change colors between shots.</li>
<li>Set one camera up on a tripod, and take a shot.</li>
<li>Set up the other camera to replace the first, using the same settings, and take a shot.</li>
<li>Load the images from both cameras to your computer.</li>
<li>Zoom into one section with high detail and compare the hell out of both images side by side.</li>
<li>Linger around at step 6 or repeat EVERYTHING until you feel that the camera you love and always wanted to &#8216;win&#8217; all along gets better results than the other one that you hate.</li>
</ol>
<p>Okay, i&#8217;m being a bit sarcastic. But seriously, this is how pixel peeping usually ends up happening.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not that pixel peeping isn&#8217;t without its merits, but if you have taken more pictures of $20 bills taped to a wall compared with actually interesting subject matter, you have chosen the wrong hobby. Perhaps chainsaw juggling would be a more suitable endeavor instead.</p>
<p><span id="more-182"></span></p>
<p>Some people also consider pixel peeping to be an Internet sport. If you do choose to engage in this giant tub of fail, at least don&#8217;t go around on discussion boards making quotes like this:</p>
<blockquote><p><span class="forumsindent0">&#8220;in my eyes nikon colors look more fake&#8230;that is why i never switched to nikon, even though they make amazing cameras a lot of times the color look too saturated, not natural at all canon has the opposite tendency, which i prefer&#8230;&#8221;</span></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;for my eyes,  Nikon&#8217;s color looks more natural, no?   From the examples,  the tree and lawn has a warmer green.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>So what exactly is wrong with those quotes? They seem like perfectly legitimate critiques of color, right?</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what&#8217;s wrong- when the image that is being pixel peeped is that of a Bailey&#8217;s Irish Cream bottle label with a <strong><em>painted rendition of a pastoral nature scene</em></strong>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.beanos.com/~tsoutij/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/d300_iso8001.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-184" title="50d_nr-std_iso800" src="http://www.beanos.com/~tsoutij/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/50d_nr-std_iso800.jpg" alt="" width="240" height="180" /><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-185" title="d300_iso8001" src="http://www.beanos.com/~tsoutij/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/d300_iso8001.jpg" alt="" width="240" height="180" /></a></p>
<p>Yup. Every time I think I have seen something silly, the Internet shows me how much I have to learn about silliness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beanos.com/~tsoutij/wp/2008/11/pixel-peeping-absurdity-brand-vs-brand-color-rendition/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
